The Long-Range Forecast
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f6f7/2f6f7d9e0ee1ddf5cc1d8277d862cbe943537d6a" alt="A parent says to a child in a bombed out room surrounded by war, 'So because the future looked poorer and more dangerous, we spent, and I concede in hindsight this wasn't thought through, all our money on missiles.' A parent says to a child in a bombed out room surrounded by war, 'So because the future looked poorer and more dangerous, we spent, and I concede in hindsight this wasn't thought through, all our money on missiles.'"
Jon Kudelka
At any other time, the proposal to spent $270 billion over the next decade on national defence would have captured headlines. But this announcement caused only a brief ripple in a news cycle dominated by the coronavirus and gloomy economic news. Yet these very elements had prompted the government’s decision. We were told we needed to ‘prepare for a post-Covid world that is poorer, more dangerous and more disorderly’. Amid rising Indo-Pacific tensions, $800 million was earmarked for the AGM-158C Long Range Anti-Ship Missile.